CleverUP

Rate this place

Level 6 Local Expert

The client is a child of 15 years old, the service is career guidance testing for Surganov 29. The reception is conducted by a psychologist (not a career therapist or a neuropsychologist). Stage 1 is a 25-minute test with VR glasses. Then a report is generated in a special program. The report is sent by e-mail. When I asked to print it, they said that it was not possible to print such a large report to each client, and that they were saving money. The program that generates the report did not work immediately: for 15 minutes, the psychologist tried to contact technical support. When the report was generated, I saw that the psychologist had misspelled the child's name, although at first they agreed to process the PD, and I could at least see how the name was spelled correctly if in doubt. This is a beacon for the competence of a specialist. This was followed by the so-called interpretation of the test - strengths and weaknesses. So I want to say that the role of the psychologist was that she just read this report to us. There was no specialist work there - interpretation, analysis, or at least a description of the result in their own words. Also, our psychologist did not understand the structure of the report that she read to us: she could not distinguish the footer of the document with the name of the section from the name of the described indicator. And the salt begins with the selection of professions. In order to choose a profession for the child, the report was uploaded to the neural network in Telegram. This is not even some kind of specially trained neural network, but one of many available to any user today! I just couldn't believe my eyes! The suggested professions range from writer to code developer. My child's neural network is set up much more precisely. In general, the conclusion is this. The psychologist (at least ours) is incompetent in career guidance and illiterate. The methodology is questionable. Think a hundred times about whether you need such a consultation.

See original · Русский

Show business's response

Юлия Кривошеева

Level 2 Local Expert

Не рекомендую профориентацию в scleverUp: дорого и поверхностно У меня есть образование и опыт работы в сфере дефектологии и психологии, поэтому оцениваю услугу не просто как мама, а с профессиональной точки зрения. Увы, центр scleverUp разочаровал. Создалось четкое ощущение, что задача центра — не качественно помочь подростку в самоопределении, а просто заработать. Услуга ощутимо дорогая и абсолютно не оправдывает свою стоимость. Что смутило по существу: 1. С ребенком никто предметно не общался. Контакт не был установлен, живого диалога-интервью не случилось. 2. Основной инструмент — тест Шульте (диагностика объема внимания). Его спокойно можно пройти в интернете и с тем же успехом обработать через ИИ. 3. Рекомендации по итогам вызывают недоумение. Список «запрещенных» профессий для девочки: не пилот, не сварщик, — спасибо, это очевидно и без платной диагностики. Дальше — сюрприз: из-за «повышенного стресса» , что не удивительно в данных условиях, предложили присмотреться к профессии библиотекаря и списку «профессий будущего» из разряда «волшебного домика». Ни глубины, ни индивидуального подхода. Впечатление: формальная процедура под соусом современной профориентации. Хотелось вернуть как минимум половину стоимости, а по-хорошему — всю сумму. Если ваша цель — выбросить деньги и потерять время, вам сюда. В остальных случаях ищите специалистов, которые действительно работают с мотивацией и личностью ребенка, а не транслируют шаблоны.

Александр С.

Level 3 Local Expert

I signed up with Natalia because I wanted to try the CleverPoint EVA testing system I passed the VR test (by the way, it turned out to be fascinating and not at all scary). The test results were partly surprising and partly expected. Together with Natalia, we discussed my problems and determined which approaches would be most effective to solve them. We have already started to take the first steps together with her and I felt the changes in my life. During the first visit to Natalia, I was looking for a job. I included the data from the CleverPoint EVA test report in my resume and it was to them that a potential employer drew attention, and later hired me. Natalia is a real professional. I am grateful for the warm and supportive approach and remain impressed by her knowledge and experience. I fully recommend this therapist to anyone who is looking for help in solving their personal problems.

See original · Русский

Show business's response

Смартклик С.

Level 2 Local Expert

It's nice to see that modern technologies have come to psychology. My request was very interesting and surprisingly easy to solve.

See original · Русский

Show business's response

Beliza-S

Level 8 Local Expert

With the help of a Chinese game console, the guys determine a person's talents and abilities - this is an obvious scam or even fraud. Ostap Bender is dead, but his work lives on.

See original · Русский

Show business's response

CleverUP

4 reviews