I was a defendant in an administrative case. Judge Kuzenek D. A. treated the case professionally, considered all the circumstances and made a fair decision.
The terrible quality of the employees' work. It was necessary to write a statement of claim, so two employees barely explain anything. Words or explanations should be extracted from them with ticks. And still, after submitting the application, some nuances are revealed. Is it really impossible to do your job efficiently? Or if the court is the supreme instance, then how can it work anyway?
He came to court , presented a description for an administrative offense. The petition. Judge PAREMSKY Ya. I do not remember the patronymic, I did not delve into it and announced the fine. His disrespectful attitude towards the offender . I want to write a complaint. But the chairman of the court gently said.... mario did not. I understand it's useless. There is no decent attitude towards violators. The judge did not respond to the violation of the administrative process indicated during the court session. Sorry clo u n and not the judge.(it's an insult, not competence and professionalism)
Good afternoon friends! Peace be upon you! By the will of fate, I had to be in court as a defendant! Despite the false statements of the applicants in the protocols, the judges who examined the case materials worked impartially! I have repeatedly been convinced that the judges at Pushkin (Gomel) have a Conscience! God bless you! Peace, joy and love to every home in our country!... A low bow to the good judges!
I wouldn't give a single star, but then you can't write a review.
On January 5 this year, being a citizen of Russia, a disabled person of the II childhood group, I drove my Kia car registered in Russia, the intersection of Kirova St. and Ave. Victories. according to clause 106 of the Traffic Regulations of the Republic of Belarus. A Mazda, also registered in Russia, was driving across my path, the driver was also a Russian, who ignored paragraph 107 of the traffic regulations of the Republic of Belarus and committed an accident with me. Mazda suffered more. My car remained fully operational, except that the washer tank burst. I called the traffic cops, who came and accused me of violating paragraph 103 of the traffic regulations of the Republic of Belarus. I proved my innocence to them. I was ignored. On January 25, at the commission in the traffic police of Gomel, my arguments were also ignored, they gave a fine of 2 basic values. And in court, Judge Paremsky also ignored my arguments and upheld the fine. A lawyer from Russia says that I did not violate anything, I have to go to the Supreme Court of the Republic of Belarus, but I do not need it. I don't need this hassle. After that, he refused a residence permit in the Republic of Belarus. I did not pay the fine and I am not going to pay it, because I am not guilty!!! A very unpleasant impression of Belarus. You can't even defend your rights in court.
See original
7
6
A
Anonymous review
February 19, 2020
When I was in the court itself, the staff were responsive, they helped and explained everything. But as for the phone, they will transfer you from one number to another, since they themselves cannot answer the questions asked or refer to other structures - like they do not do this.