Диагностика готовности к школе и трудностей в обучении для детей 5-8 лет!
Дорогие родители рады сообщить вам о новой услуге, которая сделает вашу жизнь легче!
Вы можете пройти диагностику в любом филиале в Минске!
Поможем определить слабые стороны
I highly recommend a child nutrition specialist to Jan Vinogradov: at 1 year and 3 months old, the son did not want to eat solid food and try something new from food, did not want to chew, storing everything behind his cheeks, and sometimes caused vomiting.
After the consultation, we began to follow Yana's recommendations, and he already asks with interest for adult food from our plates, chews a little, I don't even puree vegetables anymore, and ate meatballs! In addition, he is slowly learning to eat himself.
Yana took the matter seriously, and before the consultation, I needed to fill out several questionnaires about my son so that she could give us the necessary advice more precisely. In addition to recommendations, we were also given advice on spoons, the correct seating of the child at the table, joint meals, how to interest him in food, even with links to wildberries.
In addition, the price of the consultation is very pleasant, so if someone has a financial issue, such an amount can be found.
I recommend Neuronics specialist Yana Vinogradova to everyone!
We were consulted by the speech therapist Vasilyuk Maria. My son has atypical autism. Maria immediately found an approach to her son, consulted, the consultation took place in a playful way, calmly and naturally (parents of children with such a diagnosis understand what I mean)))))Everything is clear and without excess water. The further work strategy is clear and justified!!! Thanks! We are waiting for the lesson) The price for the consultation is adequate.
Unfortunately, the visit to this center left only a negative impression. I really regret that I trusted the recommendations and spent time and money on it. Of course, the number of rave reviews about him is surprising. I took a 4-year-old child to a neuropsychologist for diagnosis. About the friendliness and friendliness that the reception staff, the diagnostic staff, apparently did not hear, but it can still be attributed to magnetic storms. But the trash on the diagnosis still does not fit into my head. When making an appointment for diagnosis, the administrator warned that you will need to have an anamnesis with you: childbirth and pregnancy, the development of a child UP to a year old. At the diagnosis itself, the dissatisfaction of specialists was caused by the lack of tests at the moment. OK, they were in electronic form. Then, with a smart look, they began to decipher them for me, although I didn't seem to have an appointment with a pediatrician. At the same time, no one even asked if the pediatrician had seen these tests, which he prescribed. The funniest moment in this decoding was that they tried to prove to me that I did not understand where the reference values were indicated in the table with the results, and where the actual result was. I.e., in all seriousness, they claimed that my child's actual hemoglobin value was in the range 111-141, and it should be 150. Then we saw one blood test of the first year of life and determined that my child had OCD because in the first year of life he had low hemoglobin, and no one was engaged in raising it. Everything in that context, well, what the hell did you want, you should have thought earlier. In their universe, apparently, you can raise the hemoglobin of a baby at the click of your fingers, the selection of the drug, the duration of its intake is all for weaklings ...
Further, with a claim, they asked me how it is, I'm taking the child to the lode, but they did not pass the deficiency test. I have not been answered about the deficits of what exactly.
Then the dialogue about sleep amused me too. They ask what's wrong with sleep. I specify what moment they are interested in, now the child is sleeping normally. They ask, but before, what was bothering them. Well, I say in infancy I woke up all the time, until we started sleeping together. And the specialist gives me: "Are you sleeping together now?" Excuse me, is this a neuropsychologist's diagnosis for sure?
Then I say there was a period of night terrors. It was clear from the reaction that the specialist did not understand what I was talking about, but there were no clarifying questions. Here I already had a question, why did we get into the subject of sleep then.
At the end of the diagnosis, I was also recommended to work on my anxiety. There was no answer to the question of how they drew conclusions about my anxiety.
I cannot comment on the part of conducting tests with a child, because there is nothing to compare it with. But it feels like there was noticeably less in the printed conclusion than was said in words. Recommendations for further activities with the child are quite generalized, easy to Google, for such recommendations there is no need to go to the diagnosis.
I do not recommend visiting this center.