if it were possible to put 0 stars, then I would be happy to put it.
I'll write it in order.
The first and most important thing is that the establishment has nothing to do with the profession of a cook. my knowledge of cooking has not increased by a single gram, because they did not give me any knowledge at the college itself. I do not know if this is the attitude towards students after 11th grade, or if this is generally the case. The question is rhetorical. The funny thing is that, having no practical skills, we were promptly put into practice as a whole group in the second month of our studies. In your opinion, is this how training should be conducted? Isn't it funny yourself, though? and my favorite topic is the wonderful exams, namely the practical ones. buying food at your own expense is a relish when they also say "cook for three servings", but in the end it turns out that even one serving is not always eaten, because the commission (which, by the way, has nothing to do with the profession of a cook. they are focused only on theory and have not worked in the kitchen for a single day) did not approve of your dish. all the products that end up in the trash end up in the trash. thanks, I don't print money by the way.
farther. It's a matter of practice... this is the most painful topic. I've worked everywhere. everywhere the attitude is bestial, because you come and you don't know how to do anything. not even through his own fault, but through the fault of this posh institution, because our master did not conduct industrial training. It was as if he was just present for some reason during the entire training period of our group. next, the question of paid practice. you come in, work for 12 hours 2/2 (at best) and get three rubles. the outcome is even better to get to the kshp, where the situation is no better, but fortunately I did not feel this exotic, because they sent me to restaurants.
I also don't understand this joke with a 25% deduction from salary. I am interested to know what this money is used for, if the college has not changed during my studies, and they do not buy food for the exam. What are the products? even napkins need to be bought at your own expense..
in general, if I had found out about this earlier and at least asked for reviews on the Internet, I would most likely have taken the documents from there immediately. even at school, there was no such bestial attitude. The master is irresponsible, childish. why are such shots needed at all? in order to supervise a whole group of people, you probably need to have at least responsibility, and not try to figure out what to do. He has a trick of saying one thing first and then another after a while. make up your mind already. Our curator didn't do anything different either. when they came to her for couples, she threw a tantrum at 28 adults about phones. probably, in order for students to have the desire to learn, it is necessary to teach not according to textbooks from the time of Lenin.
in general, I do not know why this college exists at all. apparently, in order to destroy any desire to work in a profession.
Great college. Once upon a time, 12 years ago, I studied here and got an education as a Cook, and in a set of beaten friends for life.
Of course, I haven't worked as a cook for a long time (an objectively underestimated profession), but thank you
A good educational institution. I got the 4th grade, I'm finishing my correspondence studies and I like everything. Responsive teachers will always meet you halfway, they know their business, they will prompt and help. A lot of practice, and on-the-job training