We were here on appeal.It's totally creepy.They're dancing to the prosecutor's tune.They do not take into account the interests of a 15-year-old child.The proofs are adjusted, which are beneficial for statistics no more.The child has panic attacks when thinking about his father.The conclusions of two psychotherapists were attached.But no one cares.Instead of making a decision in favor of the child and taking into account the psychological state, the child's desire, etc.And they do not take into account that the father of the child may possibly rape the child.That's horrible.They're probably waiting for the child to commit suicide, God forbid.Then get moving.And they will blame the mother for everything.My score is minus 10.That's fair enough.

See original · Русский

Евгений

Level 9 Local Expert

It's kind of surreal, I have to prove the obvious things. The court does not consider scratches, traces of installation and operation to be defects. For him, a defect is the inability to perform functions, and it doesn't matter if it's working properly or not, the main thing is to perform. If the salons start selling broken and scratched cars as new, do not be surprised, everything is legal, despite the interstate GOST standards and laws. That's who the neural network should replace in the first place, so that there is objectivity and impartiality.

See original · Русский

Валерий

Level 7 Local Expert

No comments … There is no justice in this court, as well as in the region as a whole.

See original · Русский