I turned to Gashinsky Anton Vladimirovich with a question about flooding the apartment (receiving compensation for damage).
I received a consultation in style: "Wait for the assessment of specialists, if something goes wrong, I will give you the contacts of a good lawyer." I.e. essentially no help was provided.
During the consultation, Gashinsky said that he was ready to provide support by answering specific questions in messengers. In fact, on the very first question about where to send a complaint against the chairman of the HOA - "merged". I received unsubscriptions in the style of any messages asking to answer my question: "I have not been able to find an answer yet," "My correspondence has been deleted, write the question again," etc.
I do not recommend this lawyer, at least in matters of flooding the apartment.
Money thrown away
I am very grateful for the legal and simply human assistance to lawyer Maslov E.D. Thanks to his competent actions, p4. Article 328 was reclassified in paragraph 3 of Article 328 and given a practical minimum term of 6.6 years of general regime. Despite the fact that the prosecutor requested 9 years, and the minimum term under paragraph 3 of Article 328 is 6 years!!!! This is just a great result! None of us even hoped for such a thing. And Yevgeny Dmitrievich always gave consultations and in a short time, although he could not have done so (this was not directly relevant to the case). Thank you very much!
I express my great gratitude to Maslov Evgeny Dmitrievich and his colleagues! For professionalism, for consultations, answers to questions, for written complaints. For the termination of the administrative case! A lawyer with a capital letter, who knows all the subtleties of the case and the law. Thank you, Evgeny Dmitrievich, and your colleagues!
I would like to express my gratitude to Evgeny Dmitrievich Maslov. The case is complicated, they applied very late, after sending the case to the prosecutor's office. My boyfriend was charged with art.328 part 4 and art.328-1 (note), the forecasts were sad, the term was from 10-20 without amnesty and parole. Evgeny Dmitrievich participated personally, competently built a line of defense. As a result, Articles 328-1 were removed altogether and Article 328 part 4 was reclassified into Article 328 part.3. They gave 10 years plus a fine, but the amnesty (decree of 2019) immediately took effect, minus 1 year. As a result, 9 years old. This is a very good result in our business. The main thing is that the possibility of parole and the effect of amnesties have been preserved! Thank you for your participation and help. I recommend contacting you, even if the situation seems hopeless.
Thank you very much for your help in the criminal case under Article 205 of Article 4. The case was not brought to court.I will recommend you to anyone who is in a difficult situation.My animals and I are grateful to you!All the best!!!
I would like to express my deep gratitude to the lawyers Maslov E. D. and Karpushonok O. Y. for their excellent work and support, thanks to their help we managed to get the minimum possible punishment.
Special thanks to the assistant lawyer Trubchik Y. N. for his help in conducting the case.
In general, it was very pleasant to work with them and I am completely satisfied with the result, I recommend it.