The judge makes up all sorts of nonsense. For example, assessing the deterioration of my financial situation, the judge refers to the fact that I have no rights to the car I bought during the marriage, because my spouse drove it, and other fictional nonsense that is not regulated by anything and is not registered anywhere. To my requests to clarify the norms or to give references to legislative acts where I could find confirmation of these statements, the judge refuses, referring to the fact that he does not provide consultations. It is impossible to recuse the judge, because the same judge decides on his recusal and simply refuses, without challenging my arguments. I spent the last money on the courts (which have been going on for about a year) and lawyers. There is currently no financial opportunity to hire a lawyer. The debt continues to accumulate at a high rate and there is nowhere else to go. The judge thinks one-sidedly and does everything possible to justify the ex-spouse. An appeal for clarification to the chairman of the court has not yet brought any results. It is useless to challenge, because the higher court, without even delving into it, simply copies the original decision.

See original · Русский

Елена Андруконис

Level 2 Local Expert

I would like to express my deep gratitude to Judge Lukashevich Ekaterina Vaclavovna. She was getting to the heart of the matter and not just asking standard questions. She was trying to do justice. He is a justice of the Peace and probably one of the best. I would like to apologize for all of us who sometimes do not behave adequately at the meeting. It is very difficult for them to be in negativity from all sides all day long. Sincerely, Elena Alexandrovna

See original · Русский

Aleaksei

Level 8 Local Expert

I found myself in a desperate situation. The ex-wife persuaded me to sign an agreement on children. But when I signed it, I thought I was over-insured by the clause that says that the agreement can be changed or terminated if my financial situation worsens significantly. According to this agreement, I have undertaken to pay child support in basic amounts, which significantly exceeds the amount of alimony, established by law. After the conclusion of the agreement, the ex-wife fraudulently took possession of all the jointly acquired property. Soon I completely lost my earnings. There were health difficulties (you need to do a complicated operation), but the agreement, as it turned out, is not possible to terminate or change even through the court. The judge makes up all sorts of nonsense. For example, assessing the deterioration of my financial situation, the judge refers to the fact that I have no rights to the one I bought during the marriage a car, because his wife drove it, and other fictional nonsense, which is not regulated by anything and is not registered anywhere. To my requests to clarify the norms or to give references to legislative acts where I could find confirmation of these statements, the judge refuses, referring to the fact that he does not provide consultations. It is impossible to recuse a judge, because the same judge decides on his recusal and simply refuses, without challenging my arguments. I spent the last money on the courts (which have been going on for about a year) and lawyers. There is currently no financial opportunity to hire a lawyer. Debt continues to accumulate at a high rate and there is nowhere else to go. The judge thinks one-sidedly and does everything possible to justify the ex-spouse. Request for clarification from the Chairman the trial has not brought any results so far. It is useless to challenge, because the higher court, without even delving into it, simply copies the original decision. If anyone has encountered a similar situation after a divorce, please tell us how to solve this problem?

See original · Русский