2 children went there.
A wonderful team.A sincere, humane, wonderful manager.
My personal love from the educators is Ekaterina Stanislavovna.To be honest, I cried when I said goodbye.Very lucky, the child went to Svetlana Olegovna and Ekaterina Stanislavovna for a year.I'm sorry, I won't tell you the name of the assistant teacher, but she is also a wonderful, kind woman.
Of the bad things, I can say one thing, and not bad, but neutral-all people are different, children are different.It is sometimes difficult for us adults to communicate with different people, and so it is here.The first society.+ every child needs an approach.And here you need to take a closer look, make friends.There are no bad teachers in the garden.There are simply not "our" people.There is no contact, that's all.It happens that way
The garden number speaks for itself. 66. Of the positive, only the educator Ekaterina Stanislavovna. The administration of the garden leaves much to be desired. Respect for parents and children is zero.
Hello. The review of the DDU 66 may be endless, but...he is infinitely negative. It doesn't make sense to describe the whole "system" in terms of tools, but you should know that you will get a lot of nerves here. One thing is for sure, that our teacher is the best in the world and all the negativity from the administration falls on her shoulders. I want them to finally think about their work, giving information and hiding the facts of embezzlement of parental funds.