The car was damaged in an accident with a drunk driver who drove into us. It was not cost-effective to restore the car because the repair amount exceeded the cost of the car. The insurer itself said we will scrap the car and pay the average amount on the market for the car. The appraiser arrived and immediately: - you start to restore what to do here, after photographing the car, he said drive up to the insurance company and sign the calculation. After 2 weeks, they carried out a collusion from the amount of the calculated 13 thousand. The payout was only an extra 23% of the total amount, since they calculated that the car was in 2010 and the car was 77% worn out, the amount of payments would be this measly 23%. It is not clear how it happened that even though the car was in good condition before the accident (garage storage) he was recognized as an almost decommissioned option. Conclusion: even if you are not to blame for an accident, especially with a drunk driver, you need to have at least a car no older than 5 years so that the amount of payments at least slightly covers its repair, and we were left without a car because the amount of repairs exceeds its cost and without a means of transportation. I don't recommend it.

See original · Русский

Максим

Level 4 Local Expert

There are no advantages. It's disgusting - an accident out of the blue, without movement, 4 elements were damaged, the amount of insurance payment does not correspond to the amount of repairs. I don't recommend it.

See original · Русский

Денис Кирисик

Level 13 Local Expert

I quickly took out car insurance

See original · Русский

Beleximgarant

Add photo or video

Address

Contacts

Business hours

Directions

Features

Customer traffic and business hours

Similar places nearby

8 reviews